I have literally just sat down from seeing the 3D re-release
of James Cameron’s epic, “Titanic”.
Having only ever seen this film on a screen no bigger than
32”, I can say wholeheartedly that the film belongs in the cinema. It truly is
an epic and seeing it on a big screen is, in every sense of the word, breath-taking,
to the point where I literally had to remind myself to breathe at certain
moments.
What you miss on a smaller screen is the detailing of the
film; you can see everything from the textures of the ship’s bow, to the ornateness
of the decorations in the first class quarters. Everything is so much more vivid
and bright, to the point where you can see the hairs on Leonardo Dicaprio’s
impossibly beautiful face. The film is absolutely beautiful, and the action
scenes are so much more panic ridden and emotive; but I was also amazed at how
the quiet stillness of the calmer scenes amongst the panic translated. These
are the scenes I feel made best use of the cinematic re-release.
And now for the controversial topic of the films 3D conversion;
a topic that has divided critics. I for one was not a fan. For the vast
majority, the 3D was obtrusive, invading and, worst of all, misused. The worst
use of the conversion was towards the very beginning of the film when Kate
Winslet steps out of the car and turns her head upwards to see the gigantic
ship. Whilst I remember this shot so well from when I originally watched the
film, here it had been ruined because suddenly I had a giant bonnet coming
towards me.
Because the conversion relies on the use of different
plates, what is most affected is James Cameron’s original and beautiful cinematography.
The best example of this is one of the film’s more memorable scenes, where Kate
Winslet and Leonardo Dicaprio ‘fly’ at the front of the ship. Whilst the two
protagonists should be at the forefront of the shot, they aren’t. Instead a
great metal wire is; invading the shot and pushing the romance into the
background.
The only point in which the 3D conversion didn’t bother was
during the actual disaster scenes, and that’s because there is so much going on
that you don’t really notice it; it’s becomes unnoticeable. You aren’t thrown
into the experience as the 3D conversion should do, but instead become accustomed
to it.
What I was impressed with, in terms of the 3D conversion was
the colour. Most 3D films I have seen are drained by those bloody awful
glasses, but this wasn’t the case with ‘Titanic’. The film had been saturated
and so kept its previous bright visuals, instead of being washed out.
Despite there not being a 2D option, I would strongly
encourage anyone to go and see the film quickly before its shoved back onto DVD
at twice the price than it was 3 months ago.